Skip to content

10 ways to word a sensitive query

By Adrienne Montgomerie

When you’re worn out, incredulous, and exasperated, it can show in your queries. The samples below give some ideas you can use to word your thousandth query just a little differently, and maybe more softly.

  1. What do you think about including [a line about how this person is related]?
  2. Would critics agree that [a 15% change means the level has remained flat]?
  3. Will people trying to carry out this sequence know instinctively to do [the missing steps]?
  4. Does this need to address the common criticism/ contrary view that [dogs are in fact man’s best friend]?
  5. Will readers wonder how this is [physically possible]?
  6. Would rephrasing this slightly help clarify intentions while [being true to the character/ not violating the laws of gravity]?
  7. Would it help readers understand this action if we explain [where the third arm comes from]?
  8. While this activity never fails to capture attention, it seems to demonstrate [something entirely different] rather than [the topic here]. Consider substituting [this other activity].
  9. Can the time periods between ticks on the horizontal axis be made even? The line will tell a very different story when the intervals are not 28, 19, 11, 11, 6, and 10 months.
  10. Does this mean [feathers are a form of fur]? If not, can you explain it another way so I can help clarify?

WHY IT MATTERS

There is more than one reason to write queries this way. Of course, we don’t want to raise the writer’s defenses, causing them to react without considering what wasn’t working. There’s also the chance that we (the editor) got it wrong—that we don’t know some key bit about the subject or genre, or about the audience’s background that makes the original just work. There may be a perfectly good reason that leaves are plaid on that world.

When querying something so ambiguous that you can’t suggest how to clarify it, don’t pose questions that are easy to dismiss. “Will readers understand this?” Could be answered with “Of course they will.” Identify the point of confusion as much as possible. Help the writer understand why you don’t understand, so they can think about their words in a different way, or identify the info they need to add or emphasize.

Keep queries as short as possible. Pontificating or over-explaining can really put a writer on the defensive. If you sense that a longer explanation may be necessary, simply offer that follow-up, or include links to background information. Chances are that the writer just slipped and knows immediately what you’re getting at.

Sometimes, suggesting the change (by tracking it) and querying simply “OK?” is the best action. I can think of one time that I might have accepted the editor’s change except that she wrote “Why use a big word when a short one will do.” Turns out, I had good reasons, but I might not have thought of it if that query hadn’t put me on the defensive.

Header image by Cris Saur on Unsplash

This article was originally posted on the Copyediting website on May 24, 2016.

Well, now we’ve punned it. And described it. And headlined it.

Sep 28, 2026

ACES: The Society for Editing names the winners of its 2025-26 Headline Contest.

Read More

Six Editors Announced as Recipients of the 2026 ACES Holden Diversity Fellowship

Sep 23, 2026

September 22, 2026 · By ACES Staff · ACES News Six talented editors have been selected as the seventh class of recipients of the Richard S. Holden Diversity Fellowship, a collaboration of ACES: The Society for Editing and the Dow Jones News Fund. This year’s fellows are Afia Agyapomaa Ofosu, Inez Woody, Jasmine Stole, Stephanie…

Read More

Readers respond more strongly to deeper editing, ACES study finds

Sep 15, 2026

Readers are more likely to notice and value editing when it improves how content is organized, understood, and experienced, according to a new study from ACES: The Society for Editing.

Read More

How to convince your boss to send you to an ACES conference

Aug 26, 2026

You know an ACES conference can leave you with new ideas, stronger skills, and fresh approaches to your work. But getting your boss to approve the investment may require showing how attending can benefit not only you but also your organization.

Read More

A new year for ACES: Reflections and what’s ahead

Jul 16, 2026

A new fiscal year is always a good moment to pause, look back at what we’ve built together, and look forward to what’s coming next. There’s a lot to say on both counts.

Read More

Words, people, and the privilege of serving ACES

Jul 16, 2026

I’ve told the story of my first ACES conference many, many times. Partially because it’s such a fond personal memory, but mostly because it shows how ACES brings editors together and helps them feel like they belong.

Read More

These are my people: Reflections on 30 years of ACES

Jul 8, 2026

ACES had been around for nine years when I first attended a national conference, in Cleveland. What I knew right away (and this has been said many times before) was that these are my people: people who care about the written word, people who care about getting it right for their readers, people who care about their craft and care about how their colleagues are contributing to the common goal of clarity.

Read More

Neil Holdway: A Legacy of Service to ACES

Apr 25, 2026

Neil Holdway has been part of the ACES Board for more than 20 years.

He joined in 2005 and served as treasurer, secretary, vice president, and treasurer of the ACES Education Fund. He was also the president of the ACES Board.

Read More

Nadia Geagea Pupa Wins the 2026 Robinson Prize, the Industry’s Highest Honor

Apr 25, 2026

ACES: The Society for Editing has awarded its 2026 Robinson Prize to Nadia Geagea Pupa.

Read More

Gerri Berendzen named ACES’ 2026 Glamann Award winner

Apr 25, 2026

The Board of Directors of ACES has awarded its 2026 Glamann Award to former ACES Board member and longtime news editor and teacher Gerri Berendzen.

Read More
Scroll To Top