Skip to content

Not all freelance project estimates are created equal

By Jake Poinier

I have no hard-and-fast rules about pricing freelance jobs, other than trying to figure out what the client wants. In my experience, most clients prefer project pricing to hourly rates, assuming the same overall cost. At the same time, there are subtleties in how you convey a project estimate that can make the difference between getting the job and having your prospective client seek out another freelancer. So let’s break things down a bit.

The most basic type of project estimate is the firm quote. You run the numbers based on the project scope and tell the prospect what it’s going to cost. It’s easy to convey and the client will understand the budget impact. The disadvantage, and it’s a major one, is that you’ve committed to a target that can only be negotiated down.

The second variation is the not-to-exceed estimate. It’s similar to the firm quote, but you price a little higher to give yourself leeway, telling clients the most that a project could cost them, while implying that it could come in lower if the process goes smoothly. Psychologically, that means you’re less likely to have to negotiate and you’ve got more leverage if you need it.

The third, an estimated range, takes that principle one step further: a detailed line-item quote that says a project will cost between $X and $Y, and will not exceed $Y. That approach to project estimates has several key benefits:

  • You’re providing the client comfort in knowing what the top cost will be, exactly like the not-to-exceed estimate, while also letting them know specifically how low it could be.
  • You’re giving them a clear incentive to be easy to work with (minimizing revisions, phone calls/meetings, scope creep, etc.), because they know they can save money.
  • By being conservative with your upper limit, you can almost always come in lower, touting to the client that you were able to save them money while protecting yourself against a client or project that requires more time than you calculated.

What does that look like in practice? Rather than quoting a flat fee of $2,000, you give an estimated range of, say, $1,750 to $2,250. When the project is complete and the final tally comes in at $2,100, you’ve made $100 more than you would have with your original flat-fee calculation. Woohoo! Meanwhile, the client’s perception is that you’ve come in $150 under their budget, so they’re happy.

Successful pricing isn’t just about the money, it’s also a matter of persuasion. Using an estimated range can give you an advantage on the front-end negotiation as well as your back-end profitability.

Jake Poinier blogs regularly about freelance topics at DoctorFreelance.com and owns Phoenix-based Boomvang Creative Group and More Cowbell Books. He has written several books on the business of freelancing, including The Science, Art and Voodoo of Freelance Pricing and Getting Paid, and he presented on the topics of “Persuasive Pricing” and “Beyond the Basics” at the 2017 ACES National Conference.


Header Photo by Helloquence on Unsplash.

Readers respond more strongly to deeper editing, ACES study finds

Sep 15, 2026

Readers are more likely to notice and value editing when it improves how content is organized, understood, and experienced, according to a new study from ACES: The Society for Editing.

Read More

How to convince your boss to send you to an ACES conference

Aug 26, 2026

You know an ACES conference can leave you with new ideas, stronger skills, and fresh approaches to your work. But getting your boss to approve the investment may require showing how attending can benefit not only you but also your organization.

Read More

A new year for ACES: Reflections and what’s ahead

Jul 16, 2026

A new fiscal year is always a good moment to pause, look back at what we’ve built together, and look forward to what’s coming next. There’s a lot to say on both counts.

Read More

Words, people, and the privilege of serving ACES

Jul 16, 2026

I’ve told the story of my first ACES conference many, many times. Partially because it’s such a fond personal memory, but mostly because it shows how ACES brings editors together and helps them feel like they belong.

Read More

These are my people: Reflections on 30 years of ACES

Jul 8, 2026

ACES had been around for nine years when I first attended a national conference, in Cleveland. What I knew right away (and this has been said many times before) was that these are my people: people who care about the written word, people who care about getting it right for their readers, people who care about their craft and care about how their colleagues are contributing to the common goal of clarity.

Read More

Neil Holdway: A Legacy of Service to ACES

Apr 25, 2026

Neil Holdway has been part of the ACES Board for more than 20 years.

He joined in 2005 and served as treasurer, secretary, vice president, and treasurer of the ACES Education Fund. He was also the president of the ACES Board.

Read More

Nadia Geagea Pupa Wins the 2026 Robinson Prize, the Industry’s Highest Honor

Apr 25, 2026

ACES: The Society for Editing has awarded its 2026 Robinson Prize to Nadia Geagea Pupa.

Read More

Gerri Berendzen named ACES’ 2026 Glamann Award winner

Apr 25, 2026

The Board of Directors of ACES has awarded its 2026 Glamann Award to former ACES Board member and longtime news editor and teacher Gerri Berendzen.

Read More

AP announces stylebook changes; “healthcare” tops list

Apr 24, 2026

Big reveal at the ACES conference in Atlanta: AP Stylebook editor Bratton announced that “healthcare” will now be one word

Read More

2026 Bill Walsh Scholarship goes to two winners

Feb 9, 2026

By ACES Staff The ACES Education Fund has chosen two winners for the 2026 Bill Walsh Scholarship for excellence in the editing of news. Abbey Sobelman and Sheridan Wood are the tenth and eleventh recipients of the $3,500 award, named for the late Washington Post editor and author Bill Walsh, who also was a member…

Read More
Scroll To Top