Skip to content

Dealing with religious terms: Many faiths

By Erin Brenner

In a previous article, I discussed how to handle special terms for an audience of a (mostly) single faith. That was the easy part.

This article looks at the challenging part: when a text that discusses religion is aimed at a diverse audience: people from different faiths, spiritual people of no organized religion, and people who don’t have a faith at all.

In this context, religion is a “third-rail” conversation: it’s a personal topic that people quickly become emotional about and are unlikely to agree on. If the topic isn’t treated thoughtfully and respectfully, the results could short-out any hope of communication.

Even seemingly simple choices can become complex with a diverse audience. By capitalizing God, for example, you’re respecting a lot of monotheistic believers, but some Jews use G-d or something similar instead, and atheists wouldn’t capitalize it at all.

And as a editor, you also have to balance the needs of your author and publisher. Let’s look at each of the editor’s audiences in turn.

THE AUDIENCE’S NEEDS

The whole point of publishing is communication. To successfully communicate, you need to know who your audience is.

Focus first on clarity: What will the audience understand, and what should be explained? To return to the previous article, will readers be confused if holy family is used in quotes or left lowercased? Will Holy Family be recognized as referring to Christianity’s Jesus, Mary, and Joseph? Is some distinction or explanation required so that all readers know what’s meant?

Think, too, about context, balance, and bias. A news story about religious holidays might capitalize each religion’s special terms and provide a brief explanation of each, while a comparative religion article might not cap any of the religion’s terms. Either way, all religions being discussed should be treated equally.

In Western culture, Christianity often dominates. Stop to consider whether the copy presents Christian concepts as fact or as normal, and other religions’ or atheism’s concepts as something else. Will believers of other faiths feel as though they are second class? Will atheists feel unheard?

Our goals here should be to not make assumptions and to eradicate biases so that all readers are open to the copy’s message.

THE AUTHOR’S INTENTIONS

That said, the author may be communicating a specific position on one or more religions. The bias is intentional. Maybe it’s an argument piece on how Taoism saved the author’s life or an opinion piece on the benefits of Buddhism; the intended audience is broad but the intent is narrow.

As the copyeditor, you can point out that a biased approach could turn off readers, but it will be the author’s decision to remove the bias or not. If they choose to keep it, as a professional you need to respect that decision or withdraw from the job, if you can.

THE PUBLISHER’S INTERESTS

It’s possible that the author’s intentions are at odds with the publisher’s interests. The publisher may not want to take a position on the validity of one religion or another. To avoid losing sales, it may not wish to upset a portion of their audience. It may wish to be known as all-inclusive when it comes to religious faith.

As a copyeditor, you want to know what the publisher thinks about any potential bias the author may be demonstrating. Confirm what’s acceptable and what’s not. You may be able to avoid an uncomfortable discussion with the author about needed changes if you have a supervisor who is charged with having those conversations.

If you’re the person in the hot seat, however, keep the conversation objective and professional, as you would with any sensitive query. You’re not making a judgment but pointing out the publisher’s guidelines, which you both must follow. Offer some guidance: suggest a rewrite or point to resources where the author can learn more about how to address the problems.

Here are a few resources for you and your author:

  • Religion Stylebook. Search by religion to gain an understanding of unfamiliar terms.
  • The Diversity Style Guide’s Religion Glossary. Terms from a variety of religions are organized alphabetically.
  • Conscious Style Guide’s Spirituality, Religion + Atheism. This collection of essays and resources can help you find the boundaries of what’s appropriate to say and what’s not.

Whatever decisions you make, make them thoughtfully and record them and your reasoning in the style sheet or editorial notes. You may need to explain them later.

You can’t please everyone, of course, and religion can be an emotional subject. Be willing to listen to feedback and to reconsider your editorial decisions. Even if you maintain a decision, acknowledging the critiquer’s feelings and point of view can help make them feel heard.

Respecting someone else’s thoughts and ideas, no matter who they are, is at the heart of all good communication.

This article was originally posted to Copyediting.com on 10/26/18.

Header photo by Rachel Strong on Unsplash.

How to convince your boss to send you to an ACES conference

Aug 26, 2026

You know an ACES conference can leave you with new ideas, stronger skills, and fresh approaches to your work. But getting your boss to approve the investment may require showing how attending can benefit not only you but also your organization.

Read More

A new year for ACES: Reflections and what’s ahead

Jul 16, 2026

A new fiscal year is always a good moment to pause, look back at what we’ve built together, and look forward to what’s coming next. There’s a lot to say on both counts.

Read More

Words, people, and the privilege of serving ACES

Jul 16, 2026

I’ve told the story of my first ACES conference many, many times. Partially because it’s such a fond personal memory, but mostly because it shows how ACES brings editors together and helps them feel like they belong.

Read More

These are my people: Reflections on 30 years of ACES

Jul 8, 2026

ACES had been around for nine years when I first attended a national conference, in Cleveland. What I knew right away (and this has been said many times before) was that these are my people: people who care about the written word, people who care about getting it right for their readers, people who care about their craft and care about how their colleagues are contributing to the common goal of clarity.

Read More

Neil Holdway: A Legacy of Service to ACES

Apr 25, 2026

Neil Holdway has been part of the ACES Board for more than 20 years.

He joined in 2005 and served as treasurer, secretary, vice president, and treasurer of the ACES Education Fund. He was also the president of the ACES Board.

Read More

Nadia Geagea Pupa Wins the 2026 Robinson Prize, the Industry’s Highest Honor

Apr 25, 2026

ACES: The Society for Editing has awarded its 2026 Robinson Prize to Nadia Geagea Pupa.

Read More

Gerri Berendzen named ACES’ 2026 Glamann Award winner

Apr 25, 2026

The Board of Directors of ACES has awarded its 2026 Glamann Award to former ACES Board member and longtime news editor and teacher Gerri Berendzen.

Read More

AP announces stylebook changes; “healthcare” tops list

Apr 24, 2026

Big reveal at the ACES conference in Atlanta: AP Stylebook editor Bratton announced that “healthcare” will now be one word

Read More

2026 Bill Walsh Scholarship goes to two winners

Feb 9, 2026

By ACES Staff The ACES Education Fund has chosen two winners for the 2026 Bill Walsh Scholarship for excellence in the editing of news. Abbey Sobelman and Sheridan Wood are the tenth and eleventh recipients of the $3,500 award, named for the late Washington Post editor and author Bill Walsh, who also was a member…

Read More

2025-2026 ACES scholarship and Aubespin winners

Feb 9, 2026

By ACES Staff Two students from The George Washington University’s Master of Professional Studies in publishing program are among the five winners of 2025-2026 ACES scholarships by the ACES Education Fund, including this year’s Aubespin Scholar. The recipients will receive a total of $8,500 in scholarships. The scholarships are given to students who excel in…

Read More
Scroll To Top