Skip to content

How wrong everyone is about exclamatives!

By Jonathon Owen

Last year, I was writing some grammar lessons for some online high-school courses and, strangely, I found that nearly every website I consulted on a particular point of grammar was wrong. Normally, if you think everyone but you is wrong about something, you probably want to rethink your position, because chances are you’re the one who’s wrong. In this case, though, I had backup.

But let’s rewind a bit first. You may have learned in elementary school, just as I did, that there are four major sentence types in English: declarative, interrogative, exclamative, and imperative. (There are actually five types, because interrogatives can be divided into questions formed with an interrogative like who or why and those that are simply formed by inverting the subject and verb, but we won’t get into that here.) It’s also more accurate to talk in terms of clause types than sentence types, since this is really a matter of what pieces make up a clause.

Declaratives are the default clause type, and they have a subject–verb–complement structure, as in Dwight ate the pie. Interrogatives add an interrogative pronoun or adverb or flip the subject and verb around or both, as in Who ate the pie? or Did Dwight eat the pie? or Which pie did Dwight eat? Imperatives nearly always omit the subject (though sometimes you can retain it if it’s you) and they use the bare form of the verb, like be or eat, as in Eat your pie, Dwight.

Exclamatives are the rarest type, and they’re a little stranger than the others. Most websites (like this Wikipedia article, which lacks citations) will tell you that an exclamative is any sentence expressing strong emotion or any sentence that ends in an exclamation mark (which is what my kids have apparently been taught). Most supposed examples of exclamatives are either one-word interjections like Wow! or Ouch! or declaratives that happen to end with an exclamation mark, like That pie was delicious!

At this point in my research for those grammar lessons, I was starting to question my sanity just a little. The resources I was finding online weren’t matching what I learned either in elementary school or in college, so I pulled out the big guns: The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Thankfully, it confirmed what I remembered.

An exclamative isn’t just any old clause that happens to be a little excitable. Clause type is a question of syntax, not strong emotion. Even final punctuation is not a reliable guide. Declaratives, for example, can end with periods, exclamation marks, or even question marks (as in That pie was homemade?).

Exclamatives start with an exclamative phrase that begins with what or how, followed by the subject and verb, as in What a delicious pie that was! Sometimes you can invert the subject and verb, though this sounds archaic or literary, as in Hamlet’s soliloquy: “What a piece of work is a man!”

Sometimes exclamatives even drop the subject and verb and leave only the exclamative phrase. Hamlet continues, “How noble in reason! How infinite in faculty! In form and moving how express and admirable! In action how like an angel! In apprehension how like a god!” These are all exclamatives too, even though they’re eliding the “is a man” part from the first sentence. It’s these shortened forms that are the most common. Think of how often you hear or say things like What a pain or How nice.

A handy way to tell the difference between a declarative and an exclamative is that you can usually turn an exclamative into a declarative by moving the subject and verb to the front and switching what to such or how to so in the exclamative phrase. Thus What a delicious pie that was becomes That was such a delicious pie, and How nice of you to bring us a pie becomes It was so nice of you to bring us a pie, with the implied “it was” inserted back in.

Now that you know the trick, you should have an easy time telling identifying exclamatives. Just remember that you can’t trust everything you read on the internet. What a mistake that would be!


Photo by Joy Freschly from FreeImages


This article was originally posted on the Copyediting website September 27, 2018.

Readers respond more strongly to deeper editing, ACES study finds

Sep 15, 2026

Readers are more likely to notice and value editing when it improves how content is organized, understood, and experienced, according to a new study from ACES: The Society for Editing.

Read More

How to convince your boss to send you to an ACES conference

Aug 26, 2026

You know an ACES conference can leave you with new ideas, stronger skills, and fresh approaches to your work. But getting your boss to approve the investment may require showing how attending can benefit not only you but also your organization.

Read More

A new year for ACES: Reflections and what’s ahead

Jul 16, 2026

A new fiscal year is always a good moment to pause, look back at what we’ve built together, and look forward to what’s coming next. There’s a lot to say on both counts.

Read More

Words, people, and the privilege of serving ACES

Jul 16, 2026

I’ve told the story of my first ACES conference many, many times. Partially because it’s such a fond personal memory, but mostly because it shows how ACES brings editors together and helps them feel like they belong.

Read More

These are my people: Reflections on 30 years of ACES

Jul 8, 2026

ACES had been around for nine years when I first attended a national conference, in Cleveland. What I knew right away (and this has been said many times before) was that these are my people: people who care about the written word, people who care about getting it right for their readers, people who care about their craft and care about how their colleagues are contributing to the common goal of clarity.

Read More

Neil Holdway: A Legacy of Service to ACES

Apr 25, 2026

Neil Holdway has been part of the ACES Board for more than 20 years.

He joined in 2005 and served as treasurer, secretary, vice president, and treasurer of the ACES Education Fund. He was also the president of the ACES Board.

Read More

Nadia Geagea Pupa Wins the 2026 Robinson Prize, the Industry’s Highest Honor

Apr 25, 2026

ACES: The Society for Editing has awarded its 2026 Robinson Prize to Nadia Geagea Pupa.

Read More

Gerri Berendzen named ACES’ 2026 Glamann Award winner

Apr 25, 2026

The Board of Directors of ACES has awarded its 2026 Glamann Award to former ACES Board member and longtime news editor and teacher Gerri Berendzen.

Read More

AP announces stylebook changes; “healthcare” tops list

Apr 24, 2026

Big reveal at the ACES conference in Atlanta: AP Stylebook editor Bratton announced that “healthcare” will now be one word

Read More

2026 Bill Walsh Scholarship goes to two winners

Feb 9, 2026

By ACES Staff The ACES Education Fund has chosen two winners for the 2026 Bill Walsh Scholarship for excellence in the editing of news. Abbey Sobelman and Sheridan Wood are the tenth and eleventh recipients of the $3,500 award, named for the late Washington Post editor and author Bill Walsh, who also was a member…

Read More
Scroll To Top